CLEAN : Top UN court decision to order Myanmar to prevent Rohingya genocide historic: The Gambia

The transcript discusses the trust in the International Court of Justice to bring about behavioral changes and highlights a historic unanimous decision by 17 judges against genocide. It emphasizes the need for protection of the Rohingya as a recognized ethnic group in Myanmar and expresses hope and encouragement for the community, urging the Burmese government to comply with provisional measures to prevent genocide.

What is the speaker's view on the role of the International Court of Justice?

• It should be abolished.

• It is ineffective in delivering justice.

• It can lead to changes in behavior.

• It is biased towards certain countries.

How many judges agreed on the decision regarding genocide?

• 15 judges

• 20 judges

• 10 judges

• 17 judges

What is the significance of the judges' decision according to the speaker?

• It highlights cultural differences.

• It shows a lack of consensus.

• It demonstrates global intolerance for genocide.

• It is a minor legal decision.

What does the speaker identify as?

• A Burmese official

• A member of the International Court

• A United Nations representative

• A Rohingya individual

What action does the speaker urge the Burmese government to take?

• To ignore international rulings

• To comply with provisional measures

• To seek further legal advice

• To appeal the decision