Trade Uncertainty Is ‘Not the Medicine That We Need,’ Says Ambassador Hills

Trade Uncertainty Is ‘Not the Medicine That We Need,’ Says Ambassador Hills

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the US-China trade dispute and its impact on the global economy. It highlights the confusion in trade negotiations, the importance of stability for investors, and compares current practices with those from past administrations. The discussion also touches on the political pressures faced by negotiators and the need for a strategic plan to address these issues.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main reason resolving the US-China trade issue might not solve global economic problems?

It only addresses marginal issues, not deeper structural problems.

It would immediately fix all economic issues.

It would lead to increased tariffs globally.

It would cause a recession in Europe.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the US-China trade dispute primarily affect investors?

By creating uncertainty and instability.

By providing more investment opportunities.

By increasing their profits.

By reducing global competition.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is unusual about the current US-China trade negotiations?

They are not affecting the global economy.

They have been resolved quickly.

They are characterized by significant uncertainty and mixed signals.

They are proceeding without any issues.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key concern for American farmers regarding trade negotiations?

The reduction of tariffs on European goods.

The potential for increased exports.

The need for stable and consistent trade policies.

The opportunity to negotiate directly with China.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did previous administrations handle trade negotiations differently?

They ignored the interests of constituents.

They imposed tariffs without consultation.

They focused solely on European trade.

They regularly consulted with stakeholders and maintained consistent policies.