Iran Ambivalent About Campaign Against ISIL: Samore

Iran Ambivalent About Campaign Against ISIL: Samore

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the complexities of US-Iran relations, focusing on Iran's ambivalence towards US actions against ISIL and the nuclear negotiations. It highlights the potential for a meeting between President Obama and President Rouhani, though it seems unlikely due to political sensitivities. UK Prime Minister David Cameron's perspective on Iran's role in global issues is also covered. The discussion touches on Iran's interests in Iraq and the potential impact on the Iraqi government. Finally, it addresses the US Congress's skepticism about the nuclear talks with Iran.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one reason Iran is ambivalent about the US campaign against ISIL?

They are allies with the US.

They want to strengthen Assad's regime.

They fear increased US influence in Baghdad.

They support ISIL.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is a meeting between President Obama and President Rouhani considered unlikely?

Rouhani has already met with other leaders.

The US is not interested in nuclear talks.

There is no significant achievement to announce.

Rouhani is not in the country.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Prime Minister David Cameron emphasize in his meeting with Rouhani?

Iran's leadership in the Middle East.

Iran's support for ISIL.

The need for Iran to change its nuclear program.

The success of Iran's economic policies.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Iran's interest in the defeat of ISIL?

To defend Shia territories.

To gain control over Baghdad.

To expand their territory.

To support Sunni forces.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the stance of the US Congress regarding the nuclear talks with Iran?

They are indifferent to the outcome.

They fully support the administration's approach.

They have already approved a deal.

They are skeptical and may impose sanctions.