Hormats Says Possible for U.S. and China to Reach 'Some Level of Understanding' on IP

Hormats Says Possible for U.S. and China to Reach 'Some Level of Understanding' on IP

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the complexities of the US-China trade negotiations, focusing on structural changes, intellectual property protection, and the tech competition between the two nations. It highlights the challenges in reaching a comprehensive deal, the importance of realistic expectations, and the strategic significance of technology in the 21st century. The discussion emphasizes the need for ground rules in tech competition and the potential for progress in certain areas, despite the trust deficit and differing ambitions.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the significant steps forward in US-China trade negotiations mentioned in the first section?

Increasing US exports to China

Cutting back on certain subsidies

Reducing tariffs on Chinese goods

Establishing a new trade agreement

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key challenge in reaching a comprehensive trade agreement between the US and China?

The absence of negotiators

Lack of interest from both parties

The complexity of structural issues

The need for a single, all-encompassing deal

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major factor contributing to the trust deficit in US-China trade negotiations?

Historical tensions

Recent economic downturns

Cultural differences

Lack of communication

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is at the center of the strategic and competitive battle between the US and China?

Economic sanctions

Military power

Technological dominance

Cultural influence

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential outcome if the US and China do not establish ground rules for technological competition?

Increased collaboration

Technological stagnation

Disputes and frictions

Rapid innovation