CLEAN : Syria blames US, Israel for talks deadlock

The transcript discusses a meeting where there was a disagreement on the interpretation of the agenda. One side wanted to move quickly through agenda items, while the other insisted on fully addressing each item. The discussion highlights the importance of respecting the agenda and the challenges posed by external influences, such as political pressures from other countries. Despite these challenges, there is a commitment to continue negotiations and return to Geneva for further talks.

What was the initial disagreement about in the meeting?

• The interpretation of the agenda

• The location of the meeting

• The number of participants

• The duration of the meeting

Why did one side suggest not finalizing the first item immediately?

• They were not interested in the first item

• They believed it was already finalized

• They wanted more time for discussion

• They wanted to skip to the last item

What is emphasized as crucial before moving to the next agenda items?

• Having a common vision

• Completing all items in one day

• Skipping unnecessary items

• Allowing each side to interpret freely

Which external party was mentioned as influencing the negotiation process?

• President Obama

• The European Union

• The United Nations

• The Russian Government

What commitment was made regarding the Geneva talks?

• To change the location of the talks

• To abandon them if no progress is made

• To conclude them quickly

• To continue them as long as necessary