Sullivan & Cromwell's Aquila Sees Busy Second Half for M&A

The video discusses the increasing use of executive orders across recent U.S. administrations due to legislative gridlock, particularly in the Senate. It highlights how the party in power uses regulatory authority to implement changes, though these actions often face legal challenges. The video also explores how current regulations may prompt businesses to expedite transactions to avoid potential regulatory hurdles.

Why have executive orders become more prevalent in recent administrations?

• Due to the ease of passing them compared to legislation

• To avoid judicial review

• Because Congress has become more efficient

• To increase public awareness

What is a significant challenge that executive orders might face?

• Inadequate funding

• Opposition from the Senate

• Judicial challenges in federal courts

• Lack of public support

How do the backgrounds of federal judges affect the outcome of regulatory challenges?

• Judges are not influenced by political appointments

• Judges appointed by different administrations have varying ideologies

• Judges are only concerned with state laws

• All judges follow the same legal principles

What might businesses do in response to new regulations?

• Delay their transactions indefinitely

• Accelerate their deals to avoid regulatory complications

• Ignore the regulations

• Seek public opinion before proceeding

What is the potential effect of regulations on business transactions?

• They ensure all transactions are approved

• They may complicate and delay transactions

• They have no impact on business decisions

• They make transactions easier