Federal Court To Hear Arguments Over Former Pres. Trump's Documents

The transcript discusses the legal battle over the release of former President Trump's records to the January 6th Committee. Trump claims executive privilege to prevent the release, citing the Nixon v GSA case. The court, however, has rejected this claim, with Judge Tanya Chutkan stating that presidents are not kings. Trump's legal team argues that releasing the records would harm the separation of powers and cause irreparable harm. The committee argues that executive privilege is not absolute and that the records are crucial for understanding the January 6th events. The investigation faces challenges, with subpoenas issued to Trump aides, but compliance remains low.

What is the main legal argument former President Trump is using to prevent the release of his records?

• Executive privilege

• Public interest

• Presidential immunity

• National security

What did U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan state in her ruling regarding Trump's lawsuit?

• Presidents are not kings, and plaintiff is not president

• Executive privilege is absolute

• The committee's request is valid

• The records should remain confidential

What is the committee's main argument against Trump's claim of executive privilege?

• Executive privilege is not absolute and applies to the executive branch itself

• The privilege does not apply to former presidents

• The records are already public

• The records are not relevant to the investigation

What action has the January 6th committee taken against Trump aides and allies?

• Granted immunity

• Filed lawsuits

• Issued subpoenas

• Offered plea deals

Who is the only Trump ally indicted on contempt of Congress charges so far?

• Roger Stone

• Steve Bannon

• Michael Flynn

• Rudy Giuliani