Sen. Ernst Weighs in on the Bipartisan Push to Reform Section 232 Tariffs

Sen. Ernst Weighs in on the Bipartisan Push to Reform Section 232 Tariffs

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses a bipartisan bill involving Senators Portman and Jones, focusing on ensuring Section 232 is used for national security purposes. The bill aims to apply to future deals, with the Department of Defense defining threats. It addresses the impact of tariffs on agriculture, particularly in Iowa, and outlines strategies for trade negotiations with Mexico and Canada. The video also highlights long-term trade challenges with China, including intellectual property theft and the need for better trade partnerships.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary purpose of the bipartisan bill discussed in the first section?

To eliminate all trade agreements

To ensure Section 232 is used for national security purposes

To reduce the power of the Department of Defense

To increase tariffs on all imports

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the bill propose to define national security issues?

Through a public referendum

By a committee of trade experts

By the Department of Defense

By the President's discretion

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main concern for Iowa farmers regarding the Section 232 tariffs?

Retaliatory actions affecting agriculture

Increased competition from Canadian farmers

Lack of government subsidies

Overproduction of crops

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the current strategy for trade negotiations with NAFTA counterparts?

Simultaneous negotiations with both countries

Deal with Canada first, then Mexico

Deal with Mexico first, then Canada

Focus solely on agricultural products

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major issue in the trade relationship with China?

High tariffs on American cars

Intellectual property theft

Excessive import of Chinese electronics

Lack of Chinese investment in the US