Opposition leaders condemn Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament

Opposition leaders condemn Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the lack of government accountability, particularly focusing on the absence of Prime Minister's Question Time and the implications of Brexit. It criticizes the Prime Minister for not adhering to the law requiring an extension to avoid a no-deal Brexit. The text also condemns the shutdown of Parliament, labeling it as anti-democratic and likening the Prime Minister's actions to those of a dictator.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of Prime Minister's Question Time in the UK Parliament?

It allows the Prime Minister to present new laws.

It is a time for the Prime Minister to address the nation.

It provides a platform for MPs to question the Prime Minister.

It is a ceremonial event with no real purpose.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the Prime Minister required to do according to the new law mentioned in the transcript?

Hold a referendum on Brexit.

Seek an extension to avoid a no-deal Brexit.

Resign from his position.

Negotiate a new trade deal with the EU.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the potential impact of the UK crashing out of the EU without a deal?

Improved trade relations with the EU.

No significant impact on the UK economy.

Problems with food and medicine supplies.

Immediate economic growth.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the Prime Minister's action of proroguing Parliament considered controversial?

It is required by the constitution.

It is a common practice before every election.

It is seen as a way to avoid parliamentary scrutiny.

It helps in passing new laws quickly.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the transcript describe the Prime Minister's behavior in relation to democracy?

As acting like a dictator.

As a supporter of parliamentary debates.

As a promoter of free speech.

As a defender of democratic values.