Apple: Ten Engineers Could Unlock Terrorist's iPhone

The transcript discusses the legal battle between Apple and the FBI over creating a backdoor to access an iPhone involved in a terrorist incident. Apple argues that the task is burdensome and raises security concerns, while the FBI insists the phone holds crucial information. The case involves legal, legislative, and public opinion aspects, with Apple lobbying against legislation and the judge weighing arguments.

What is the main reason Apple claims it would be burdensome to comply with the FBI's request?

• It would require significant financial investment.

• It would require hiring external contractors.

• It would take 10 engineers four weeks to develop a solution.

• It would violate international trade agreements.

Why does the FBI believe accessing the iPhone is crucial?

• To unlock other encrypted devices.

• To access financial records.

• To find out the shooters' whereabouts after the incident.

• To recover deleted messages.

What argument does Apple use regarding Congress and the FBI's request?

• Congress has explicitly banned such requests.

• Congress has not legislated this requirement.

• Congress has supported Apple's stance.

• Congress has passed a law supporting the FBI.

What legal argument does Apple use to challenge the judge's order?

• The Tenth Amendment.

• The Second Amendment.

• The First Amendment.

• The Fourth Amendment.

How is Apple trying to influence public opinion in this case?

• By reducing the price of their products.

• By offering free legal services to the public.

• By launching a new advertising campaign.

• By gaining support from other tech companies.