Real Defenses to Payment of Negotiable Instrument

Real Defenses to Payment of Negotiable Instrument

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial discusses real defenses to the enforcement of negotiable instruments, focusing on the elevated status of a holder in due course. It explains various real defenses such as forgery, bankruptcy, alteration, duress, mental incapacity, illegality, and fraud in fact. These defenses can prevent the enforcement of payment obligations under certain conditions, even for holders in due course.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary advantage of a holder in due course over a regular holder?

They are not subject to any defenses.

They are not subject to personal defenses.

They can alter the terms of the instrument.

They can demand payment at any time.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is considered a real defense against the payment of a negotiable instrument?

Late payment

Disagreement over the terms

Forgery of the instrument

Change in interest rates

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does bankruptcy affect the obligation to pay a negotiable instrument?

The obligation is nullified and becomes part of the bankruptcy estate.

The obligation is transferred to another party.

The obligation remains unchanged.

The obligation is doubled.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the effect of duress on a contract related to a negotiable instrument?

It requires renegotiation of the contract.

It has no effect on the contract.

It voids the contract.

It strengthens the contract.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does fraud in fact differ from fraud in the inducement?

Fraud in fact involves the fraudulent nature of the contract's subject matter.

Fraud in fact involves lying about conditions to enter a contract.

Fraud in fact is less serious than fraud in the inducement.

Fraud in fact is not a real defense.