Royal Brompton Hospital wins Heart Unit fight

The Royal Brompton Hospital went to court over NHS plans to close its heart surgery unit. The High Court ruled the public consultation was flawed, impacting future NHS reconfigurations. The case highlights the need for transparent processes and has cost £1 million. The Royal Brompton's victory may influence other hospitals facing closures. The NHS plans to appeal, arguing fewer units improve care quality.

What was the main reason for the Royal Brompton Hospital going to court?

• To expand its medical team

• To increase the number of operations performed

• To challenge the closure of its heart surgery unit

• To demand more funding from the NHS

What did the High Court rule regarding the public consultation process?

• It was too expensive

• It was unnecessary

• It was flawed and unlawful

• It was fair and lawful

What is the NHS's argument for reconfiguring services?

• To increase the number of surgeries

• To provide better quality care

• To save money

• To reduce the number of hospitals

What prompted the review of children's heart surgery services?

• A government directive

• A public protest

• A financial crisis

• Initiatives by parents and clinicians

What broader impact does the Royal Brompton's court victory have?

• It reduces the number of legal cases against the NHS

• It ensures all hospitals remain open

• It guarantees more funding for all hospitals

• It sets a precedent for other hospitals to challenge closures