Mueller's Done Right Thing on Grand Jury, Says Bill Gavin

The transcript discusses the role and significance of a grand jury in investigations, particularly in Bob Muller's investigation. It highlights the importance of subpoena power and the truth-telling dynamic when individuals are under oath. The discussion also covers the logistics of convening a grand jury, the need for a second grand jury, and the unique aspects of grand jury composition, including the absence of counsel during proceedings.

What is a key benefit of a grand jury in legal investigations?

• It allows public access to proceedings.

• It ensures all evidence is made public.

• It provides subpoena power and secrecy.

• It guarantees a quick resolution.

Why might a second grand jury be convened according to the discussion?

• To increase public transparency.

• To replace an ineffective first grand jury.

• To focus on a different aspect of the investigation.

• To handle a larger number of witnesses.

How are grand jury members selected compared to a regular jury?

• They are selected differently than a normal jury.

• They are chosen by the judge.

• They are randomly selected from the public.

• They are selected by the defense attorney.

What is a unique feature of grand jury proceedings?

• Proceedings are open to the public.

• Witnesses can bring their lawyers.

• Witnesses cannot bring counsel with them.

• Judges are not present during questioning.

How might the President react to family members being subpoenaed to a grand jury?

• He would likely ignore the subpoenas.

• He would ensure they have legal counsel.

• He would publicly oppose the grand jury.

• The reaction is uncertain and remains to be seen.