CLEAN : South Africans dismayed at Pistorius release

The transcript discusses the perceived inequality in the justice system, where wealth can influence legal outcomes. It highlights a specific case involving a wealthy individual, exploring public opinions and the legal process. The discussion also touches on the individual's sports achievements and the broader implications of wealth on justice in South Africa.

What is a common perception about justice for wealthy individuals?

• They can afford better legal representation.

• They are often wrongfully convicted.

• They have no influence over legal outcomes.

• They face harsher penalties.

What does the speaker suggest is the basis for legal decisions?

• Legal prescriptions

• Moral judgments

• Public opinion

• Media influence

How does the speaker view the relationship between wealth and legal outcomes?

• Wealth ensures fair treatment in court.

• Wealth can lead to more severe punishments.

• Wealth can help individuals avoid consequences.

• Wealth has no impact on legal outcomes.

What concern does the speaker express about the future if wealthy individuals are not held accountable?

• It will encourage more people to become wealthy.

• It will have no impact on society.

• It will lead to more crime.

• It will create a fairer society.

What is the speaker's opinion on the sentence given to the individual in the discussed case?

• It was too lenient.

• It was irrelevant to the crime.

• It was too harsh.

• It was fair and just.