Political Gridlock: The More You Know, the Worse It Gets

The video explores the intersection of politics and communication, highlighting how increased communication roles in the Senate have contributed to political gridlock. It traces the rise of communication staff over the decades, providing historical context and insights from Francis Lee's research. The evolution of communication methods is discussed, emphasizing the shift from traditional media to modern digital platforms.

What has been the trend in the employment of communication staff by party leaders in the Senate over the last four decades?

• A decrease in communication staff

• No change in communication staff

• A fluctuating number of communication staff

• An increase in communication staff

In 1975, what was the status of press secretaries and PR aides in the Senate?

• They were widely employed

• They were employed only by the Minority Leader

• They were not employed

• They were employed only by the Majority Leader

What is one potential downside of the increased focus on communication roles in politics?

• It enhances legislative efforts

• It reduces the need for communication

• It might detract from legislative efforts

• It has no impact on legislation

How have communication methods changed from the past to the present?

• They have remained the same

• They have become more reliant on newspapers

• They have become less important

• They have evolved to include digital platforms

What was the primary method of communication when the narrator worked on Capitol Hill?

• Television

• Social media

• Fax

• Email