CLEAN : Dutch anti-Islam MP absent as hate speech trial opens

The transcript discusses a court decision that aligns with previous assessments and statements. It emphasizes the predictability of the decision and the respect for the defendant's choice not to appear in court. The discussion also covers the implications of this decision on the proceedings, highlighting that it does not negatively affect the court's position and respects the defendant's rights.

What is the main reason the speaker believes the decision is not surprising?

• It was unexpected and unprecedented.

• It was influenced by public opinion.

• It was made by a new judge.

• It aligns with previous assessments and statements.

How does the speaker view the defendant's choice not to appear in court?

• As a respected decision that does not affect proceedings.

• As a sign of guilt.

• As a violation of court rules.

• As a strategy to delay the trial.

What right does the defendant have in the legal system according to the speaker?

• The right to a jury of peers.

• The right to remain silent.

• The right to choose whether to appear in court.

• The right to a public trial.

What does the speaker suggest about the court's position if the defendant had appeared?

• The court would have been in a stronger position.

• The court's position would remain unchanged.

• The court would have been in a weaker position.

• The court would have postponed the trial.

What is the speaker's opinion on the impact of the defendant's absence on the court?

• It puts the court in a negative position.

• It has no negative impact on the court.

• It causes delays in the proceedings.

• It leads to a mistrial.