CLEAN : UK Supreme Court rejects IS bride's legal bid to return, a "very very worrying" decision for HRW

CLEAN : UK Supreme Court rejects IS bride's legal bid to return, a "very very worrying" decision for HRW

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Moral Science

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the case of Shamima Begum, highlighting the legal and human rights issues surrounding her situation. It critiques the court's decision to prioritize national security over her right to a fair hearing, leading to her indefinite detention and deprivation of British citizenship. The discussion emphasizes the broader implications of such policies on human rights and security.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main concern regarding the placement of women and children in camps?

They are placed further outside the law.

They are provided with inadequate resources.

They receive insufficient education.

They are not allowed to communicate with the outside world.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the deprivation of citizenship affect other rights?

It limits access to education.

It prevents travel to other countries.

It restricts freedom of speech.

It acts as a barrier to accessing many other rights.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the broader implication of security policies implemented since 9/11?

They have improved global security.

They have led to more human rights issues.

They have strengthened international relations.

They have reduced the number of refugees.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the court's stance on Shamima Begum's ability to challenge her situation?

The court is actively helping her challenge it.

The court is indifferent to her situation.

The court is content with her inability to challenge it.

The court believes she can challenge it effectively.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the court's decision considered worrying from a human rights perspective?

It disregards the importance of fair hearings.

It promotes discrimination based on nationality.

It allows for the violation of privacy rights.

It supports indefinite detention without trial.