Reactions to Matt Hancock's affair from his West Suffolk constituency

The transcript discusses the political career and recent controversy surrounding an MP from West Suffolk. Since being elected in 2010, he has increased his majority, but recent events have led to public criticism. Photos of him with a close aide have sparked debate about double standards in government. Public opinion is divided, with some calling for his resignation while others defend his actions. The MP's connection to horse racing is also highlighted, and there is speculation about his political future as the pandemic continues.

What has been the trend in Mr. Hancock's election results since 2010?

• His majority has decreased over time.

• He has lost support in each election.

• He has maintained the same level of support.

• He has increased his majority at each election.

Why are some people in Newmarket critical of Mr. Hancock?

• He has broken his own rules and shown double standards.

• He has not visited Newmarket recently.

• He has failed to support local businesses.

• He has been accused of financial misconduct.

What is the main concern of the public regarding Mr. Hancock's actions?

• He has been too strict with guidelines.

• He has shown a double standard in following rules.

• He has not communicated effectively.

• He has been too lenient with restrictions.

What is Mark Richardson's opinion about Mr. Hancock?

• He believes Mr. Hancock should resign immediately.

• He supports Mr. Hancock and believes he is entitled to his life.

• He thinks Mr. Hancock has done a terrible job.

• He is indifferent to Mr. Hancock's actions.

What is the significance of horse racing in Mr. Hancock's career?

• He has criticized horse racing as a sport.

• He has used horse racing to connect with his constituency.

• He has never been involved in horse racing.

• He has banned horse racing events in his area.