CLEAN : File of climate activists celebrating Heathrow runway appeal ruling

The transcript discusses a significant victory for climate justice, highlighting the legal battle against Heathrow expansion. It emphasizes the illegal actions of the government and the need for policy change. The judgment is seen as a win for future generations, urging a reevaluation of infrastructure projects that contribute to climate change. The decision to cancel the third runway is portrayed as a powerful message to the world about the importance of addressing climate issues.

What was the main reason for opposing the Heathrow expansion?

• Economic benefits

• Climate justice

• Increased tourism

• Job creation

Who has been actively involved in fighting the Heathrow expansion?

• Airline companies

• Friends of the Earth

• The government

• Local businesses

What choice does the Prime Minister face according to the judgment?

• To expand Heathrow or not

• To be on the right or wrong side of history

• To increase taxes or reduce spending

• To support local businesses or international trade

What is the fundamental issue with big infrastructure projects like Heathrow expansion?

• They worsen climate emissions

• They are too expensive

• They take too long to complete

• They are unpopular with the public

What message does canceling the third runway send to the world?

• A commitment to economic growth

• A powerful stance against climate change

• A focus on local issues

• A disregard for international opinion