To Prorogue or Not to Prorogue, Top U.K. Judges to Decide

The video discusses the UK Supreme Court's role in ruling on the suspension of Parliament, highlighting the constitutional implications and the separation of powers. It also covers the Prime Minister's strategy following a challenging trip to Luxembourg, focusing on Brexit negotiations and the potential for a no-deal outcome. The Supreme Court's political neutrality and its impact on the UK's constitutional future are also examined.

What is the main issue the UK's senior judges are addressing regarding Parliament?

• The election of a new Prime Minister

• The drafting of a new constitution

• The suspension of Parliament

• The legality of Brexit

What was the outcome of the UK Prime Minister's meeting in Luxembourg?

• A new Brexit deal was agreed upon

• The UK decided to remain in the EU

• The EU agreed to a no-deal Brexit

• No significant progress was made

What is the official stance of the UK government regarding Brexit negotiations?

• They have stopped all negotiations

• They are planning to rejoin the EU

• They are still aiming to secure a deal

• They are focusing on a no-deal Brexit

How do the Scottish and English courts differ in their rulings on Parliament's suspension?

• English courts found it unconstitutional

• English courts ruled it was a political issue

• Scottish courts said it was to stymie Parliament

• Scottish courts supported the suspension

What is the central issue in the argument about the UK Supreme Court's role?

• The political alignment of the judges

• The separation of powers between politics and law

• The influence of the EU on UK law

• The financial implications of Brexit