CLEAN : N. Korea, Malaysia row over Kim investigation

CLEAN : N. Korea, Malaysia row over Kim investigation

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Other

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a controversial request for a DNA sample from the family of a deceased individual, deemed preposterous by the speaker. It highlights the spread of rumors defaming North Korea and criticizes the Malaysian police for their actions. The speaker suggests that South Korean authorities benefit from the incident amidst their political scandal, and accuses the US of using the situation to justify military actions. The arrest of a citizen in Malaysia is described as a human rights violation, with allegations of police misconduct and abuse.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main concern regarding the request for a DNA sample from the deceased's family?

It is viewed as an unreasonable and unprecedented request.

It is considered a violation of privacy.

It is believed to be a tactic to delay the investigation.

It is seen as an unnecessary legal procedure.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who is suggested to benefit from the incident according to the transcript?

The Malaysian government

The United States and South Korean authorities

The United Nations

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What major event is mentioned as occurring in South Korea at the time of the incident?

A political scandal

An economic crisis

A natural disaster

A military coup

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What action did the Malaysian police take without a warrant?

Arrested a suspect

Issued a fine

Seized property

Conducted a search

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What human rights violation is highlighted in the arrest incident?

Threats and violence against the suspect's family

Torture of the suspect

Unlawful detention

Denial of legal representation