Obama: 'Hard to Swallow' Tax Cut for Top 1 Percent Needed

Obama: 'Hard to Swallow' Tax Cut for Top 1 Percent Needed

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the reluctance of Congress to support policies aiding the middle class, such as raising the minimum wage, while approving tax cuts for the wealthy. It questions the justification for these tax cuts, especially given the rising income inequality and the lack of empirical data supporting the benefits of such policies. The speaker challenges the notion that economic prosperity trickles down from the wealthy, arguing instead for growth driven by a thriving middle class.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Congress's decision regarding policies to support the middle class?

They approved raising the minimum wage.

They extended insurance for the unemployed.

They refinanced student loans.

They voted for a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What argument did some Republicans make about tax cuts for the wealthy?

They have no impact on the economy.

They are more pressing now than 30 years ago.

They are less important now than 30 years ago.

They benefit the middle class directly.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main critique of the trickle-down economic theory presented in the video?

It has consistently benefited the middle class.

It has led to a decrease in income inequality.

It has not resulted in widespread economic benefits.

It has been proven effective by empirical data.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the video, where does American economic greatness originate?

From a thriving middle class.

From the top 1% of earners.

From international trade.

From government subsidies.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the video’s stance on the relationship between the top earners doing well and the overall economy?

It states that top earners' success harms the economy.

It claims that top earners' success is irrelevant to the economy.

It argues that top earners' success does not necessarily benefit everyone.

It suggests that when top earners do well, everyone benefits.