Dominic Cummings gives statement following criticism of apparent lockdown breach

The speaker addresses false reports about their whereabouts, providing evidence to refute claims of being in Durham. They discuss a family tragedy and clarify that it did not influence their actions. The speaker explains their judgment and legal reasoning during a complex situation, balancing family safety and public interest. They acknowledge public perception and the limitations of legal rules, emphasizing the need for personal judgment in extreme circumstances.

What evidence does the speaker provide to counter the claim of being in Durham on April 19th?

• Social media posts

• Travel tickets

• Photos and phone data

• Witness testimonies

How does the speaker describe the influence of their family tragedy on their actions?

• It led to attending a funeral

• It caused them to leave London

• It had no impact on their movements

• It significantly altered their plans

What does the speaker emphasize about their decision-making during the complex situation?

• They ignored legal rules

• They followed public opinion

• They prioritized personal safety over public duty

• They balanced family safety with public responsibilities

What does the speaker acknowledge about the views of others regarding their actions?

• They were unaware of any views

• They find the views irrelevant

• They understand but respectfully disagree

• They agree with all criticisms

According to the speaker, what do the legal rules fail to cover?

• All possible circumstances

• Basic safety measures

• Travel restrictions

• Public health guidelines