Trump Speech Not Protected From Riot Charges: Harvard’s Tribe

The transcript discusses whether President Trump's speech is protected by the First Amendment, referencing the Brandenburg v. Ohio case. It argues that Trump's actions incited imminent lawless action, which is not protected by the First Amendment, drawing parallels to historical events like the Reichstag fire.

What legal case is mentioned in relation to First Amendment protections?

• Brown v. Board of Education

• Brandenburg v. Ohio

• Roe v. Wade

• Miranda v. Arizona

What analogy is used to argue against Trump's First Amendment protection?

• A peaceful protest

• A public debate

• Yelling fire in a crowded theater

• A political rally

What historical event is Trump's actions compared to?

• The fall of the Berlin Wall

• The Boston Tea Party

• The signing of the Declaration of Independence

• The Reichstag fire

What does the speaker claim Trump's actions were inciting?

• Imminent lawless action

• A political debate

• A new law

• A peaceful protest

What was the outcome of the actions incited by Trump according to the speaker?

• A peaceful transition of power

• A violent decapitation of a government branch

• An economic boom

• A new political party