VOICED: Corporate money pours into US campaigns

The transcript discusses Joe Sestak's entry into the Pennsylvania Senate race and the negative publicity he faced, including attack ads funded by conservative groups like the Club for Growth. It highlights the impact of a Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited campaign funding, leading to increased influence of special interest groups. Both Democrats and Republicans benefit from these funds, but conservative groups are often better financed. The transcript concludes with the financial dynamics of elections, noting the potential for record-breaking spending.

What was a significant factor in the negative publicity faced by Admiral Joe Sestak during his Senate race?

• His military background

• A Supreme Court decision

• His personal life

• His educational qualifications

Which group was primarily responsible for the attack ads against Joe Sestak?

• National Rifle Association

• Club for Growth

• American Civil Liberties Union

• Democratic National Committee

What change in campaign funding rules allowed corporations to influence elections more significantly?

• Permission to fund front groups without disclosure

• Mandatory disclosure of all donors

• Increased donation limits for individuals

• Ban on foreign donations

How do special interest groups use their influence in political campaigns?

• By endorsing candidates publicly

• By funding attack ads

• By hosting debates

• By organizing public rallies

What is a consequence of the surge in non-regulated funds during election seasons?

• Simplification of campaign strategies

• Increase in political advertisements

• Reduction in campaign costs

• Decrease in voter turnout