Lewis: Substantive gaps between EU and UK on Northern Ireland Protocol

The transcript discusses the status and negotiations surrounding Article 16, emphasizing the desire for a negotiated solution with the EU. It highlights ongoing technical conversations and meetings, the positions of involved parties, and the challenges in resolving issues related to the protocol. The importance of understanding each other's positions and the potential use of Article 16 if necessary is noted. The transcript concludes with a focus on future steps, flexibility, and the avoidance of triggering Article 16.

Why has Article 16 not been triggered according to the speaker?

• Because it would end all negotiations.

• Because the EU has already triggered it.

• Because they want to find a negotiated solution.

• Because it is not legally possible.

What is the main challenge mentioned in the negotiations?

• Too many breakthrough moments.

• The EU's refusal to negotiate.

• Substantive gaps between the parties.

• Lack of communication between teams.

What has been achieved in the negotiations despite no breakthrough?

• An agreement to trigger Article 16.

• A finalized protocol.

• A deeper understanding of each other's positions.

• A complete resolution of all issues.

What is the speaker's view on resolving all issues by the end of the year?

• It is very likely to happen.

• It will definitely happen.

• It is a very tall order and unlikely.

• It is not necessary to resolve them.

What does the speaker suggest is better than triggering Article 16?

• Finding landing zones both sides can work with.

• Ending all negotiations immediately.

• Triggering Article 16 immediately.

• Ignoring the protocol entirely.