Software Was Sticking Point in Apple-Qualcomm Spat, Executive Emails Suggest

The transcript discusses a legal case between Apple and Qualcomm, focusing on Apple's testimony and Qualcomm's response. It highlights email exchanges that reveal complexities beyond licensing issues, which are central to the case. The judge, Lucy Coe, is noted for her strict courtroom management. The case is ongoing, with Qualcomm now presenting its defense. Despite tensions, there is hope for future collaboration between Apple and Qualcomm.

What was the surprising element in Apple's testimony regarding Qualcomm?

• Apple claimed Qualcomm cut them off.

• Apple wanted to increase their orders.

• Qualcomm refused to supply chips.

• Apple was satisfied with Qualcomm's service.

What was the main issue at the heart of the case between Apple and Qualcomm?

• Supply chain delays

• Pricing of chips

• Patent infringements

• Licensing agreements

How did the judge manage the courtroom during the case?

• She ran a tight ship with strict rules.

• She was lenient with time.

• She encouraged media presence.

• She allowed open discussions.

What was Qualcomm's strategy during their defense?

• To settle the case out of court

• To clarify misunderstandings

• To admit to the accusations

• To ignore the accusations

What was the underlying issue in the relationship between Apple and Qualcomm?

• Different business goals

• Lack of communication

• Technological incompatibility

• Distrust between the companies