CLEAN : Terminally ill UK baby Charlie Gard dies: spokeswoman

The transcript discusses the tragic situation of a boy named Charlie who was left in the hospital without treatment for months due to lengthy court battles. Experts later revealed that early treatment could have given him a chance to be healthy. The family wanted to transfer him to another hospital for treatment by a mitochondrial disease expert. They now face a lifetime of 'what ifs' and are spending their last moments with Charlie, who won't reach his first birthday.

What was the main reason Charlie was left in the hospital without treatment?

• Lengthy court battles were ongoing.

• The doctors were unsure of the diagnosis.

• His condition was not serious.

• The hospital was understaffed.

What did independent experts conclude about Charlie's condition?

• He was beyond help from the start.

• He was receiving the best possible care.

• His condition was misdiagnosed.

• Earlier treatment could have led to a normal life.

What was the parents' intention in moving Charlie to another hospital?

• To find a more affordable treatment option.

• To be treated by a world leader in mitochondrial disease.

• To be closer to home.

• To get a second opinion.

What emotional burden do Charlie's parents mention they will carry?

• The 'what ifs' of missed opportunities.

• The sadness of not having more children.

• The guilt of not trying harder.

• The anger towards the hospital staff.

What significant event will Charlie not live to see?

• His first steps.

• His first Christmas.

• His first birthday.

• His first day of school.