IMF's Lagarde Won't Face Jail in Negligence Conviction

Christine Lagarde was found guilty of negligence for not overturning an arbitration decision in 2008, but she received no sentence due to her international status and the financial crisis context. She has one appeal option at the court Ocasio. Despite being aware of the French investment agency's opposition, she believed the chances of overturning the decision were slim. The verdict primarily affects her reputation, as she has faded from French politics and has no significant political plans that could be impacted.

Why was Christine Lagarde found guilty of negligence?

• For ordering the initial arbitration

• For failing to overturn the arbitration decision

• For not attending the court

• For mismanaging funds

What was the outcome of Christine Lagarde's verdict?

• She was acquitted

• She received a fine

• She was sentenced to jail

• She received no sentence

What is the only option for Christine Lagarde to appeal the verdict?

• Supreme Court

• Court Ocasio

• European Court

• International Tribunal

What was Christine Lagarde's reasoning for not overturning the arbitration decision?

• She was not in a position to make the decision

• She was advised against it by her lawyers

• She was unaware of the option

• She believed the chances of success were low

What is the main impact of the verdict on Christine Lagarde's career?

• Ineligibility for future positions

• Financial loss

• Reputational damage

• Loss of political power