CLEAN : Malaysia accused of rights assault as terrorism law passes

The video discusses the introduction of a new security bill and its potential for abuse. It highlights concerns about arbitrary arrests without trial, drawing parallels to past laws that were misused. The timing of recent arrests during the bill's debate is seen as coincidental, raising fears of political manipulation. The government assures the law won't target legitimate activities, but historical misuse of similar laws casts doubt on these promises.

What was the government's justification for the new security law?

• To ensure fair trials for all

• To prevent arbitrary arrests

• To reduce crime rates

• To address recent arrests during the bill's debate

What is the main concern regarding the new security law?

• It might lead to increased crime

• It could be used to bypass legal processes

• It will improve national security

• It will reduce government power

How does the government assure the public about the new law?

• By promising it won't affect political activities

• By increasing transparency

• By involving international observers

• By reducing the number of arrests

What historical legislation is compared to the new bill?

• The Patriot Act

• The Homeland Security Act

• The Internal Security Act

• The Civil Rights Act

What was a significant issue with the Internal Security Act?

• It was widely abused for political reasons

• It was only applicable to foreign nationals

• It was too lenient

• It was never enforced