CLEAN : EU arms decision on Syria is more

The transcript discusses the outcomes of a meeting in Brussels regarding the EU's position on the Syrian conflict. It highlights the indecision in extending an embargo and the need to strengthen EU and US positions for the upcoming Geneva talks. The potential undesirable outcomes of the conflict, such as military victories or stalemates, are examined. The importance of a strong diplomatic initiative to pressure Russia for a transition in Syria is emphasized. The risks of the planned June conference, which could potentially benefit the regime if unsuccessful, are also discussed.

What was the main reason for the embargo being lifted at the Brussels meeting?

• A unanimous decision to lift it

• A strong diplomatic initiative

• A lack of agreement on extending it

• Pressure from the United States

Why is arming the rebels considered risky?

• It is easy to disarm them later

• It could lead to a quick victory

• It strengthens the regime

• It is difficult to disarm them later

What is needed to move towards a transition in Syria?

• An extension of the embargo

• More support for the regime

• A strong diplomatic initiative

• A military victory for the rebels

What is the potential consequence if the planned conference in June fails?

• The regime will lose ground

• The rebels will gain more support

• The regime will gain more time militarily

• The EU will impose a new embargo

How could the failure of the June conference affect Western policy?

• It would lead to immediate peace in Syria

• It would be a setback for Western policy

• It would have no impact

• It would strengthen Western policy