CLEAN : "It's shameful": reactions to the Nigerian government's Twitter ban

The transcript discusses the Nigerian government's reaction to Twitter's actions, highlighting concerns about the impact on international investors and the business environment. It criticizes the government's approach as inappropriate and suggests it sends negative signals about the rule of law in Nigeria. The discussion also touches on Twitter's decision to base its Africa operations in Ghana instead of Nigeria, speculating on potential consequences if Twitter had chosen Nigeria.

What is the speaker's main criticism of the government's actions?

• The government is focusing too much on international relations.

• The government is not regulating enough.

• The government is acting inappropriately and harming national interests.

• The government is too lenient.

How might the government's actions affect international investors?

• They will face fewer regulations.

• They will receive more incentives.

• They will be more eager to invest.

• They will become wary and consider leaving.

What challenge does the speaker highlight about doing business in Nigeria?

• High taxation rates.

• Incredibly regulated environment.

• Lack of skilled labor.

• Limited market access.

What was the recent debate on social media about?

• Facebook's new privacy policy.

• Twitter's decision to start operations in Ghana.

• LinkedIn's job posting features.

• Instagram's algorithm changes.

What might have happened if Twitter had an office in Nigeria?

• They might have faced government interference.

• They would have expanded rapidly.

• They would have received tax benefits.

• They would have been ignored by the government.