CLEAN : South Africa prosecutors to appeal for longer Pistorius sentence

The transcript discusses an appeal regarding a six-year sentence deemed too lenient by the state. The defense argues the sentence is appropriate, citing the judge's discretion. The state seeks a harsher sentence, referencing a minimum of 15 years. The court's ability to deviate from prescribed sentences is also examined.

What is the main argument of the defense regarding the sentence?

• The sentence should be reduced further.

• The sentence is too harsh.

• The trial judge acted judiciously.

• The sentence is not based on facts.

What does the state believe about the six-year sentence?

• It is based on incorrect facts.

• It is shockingly lenient.

• It is too harsh.

• It is appropriate.

Why does the state want the Supreme Court of Appeal to intervene?

• To reduce the sentence

• To uphold the current sentence

• To increase the sentence

• To dismiss the case

What is the minimum sentence for the crime discussed?

• 20 years

• 15 years

• 6 years

• 10 years

What does the court have the discretion to do regarding sentences?

• Increase sentences without reason

• Deviate from minimum sentences with compelling circumstances

• Ignore state appeals

• Reduce sentences arbitrarily