CLEAN : US: Democrats say administration briefing on Soleimani fell short

The transcript discusses a briefing where critical questions about an imminent threat were left unanswered. Despite the presence of 97 senators, only a few asked questions before leaving. The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the lack of evidence supporting the claim of an imminent threat, specifically regarding the operation against Soleimani. The briefing failed to provide information on the nature of the threat or intelligence justifying the actions taken. The speaker concludes with concerns about the absence of concrete evidence and suggests that the threat may not have existed.

What was the speaker's main concern about the questions asked during the session?

• The questions were too easy.

• Not enough questions were asked.

• The questions were not answered satisfactorily.

• The questions were irrelevant.

How did the speaker feel after attending the briefing?

• Unsatisfied and concerned about the lack of evidence.

• Confident about the future plans.

• Satisfied with the answers provided.

• Indifferent to the information shared.

What was the speaker's takeaway regarding the imminent threat?

• The threat was clearly defined.

• The threat was resolved.

• The threat was exaggerated.

• There was no evidence of an imminent threat.

What did the speaker suggest about the existence of the imminent threat?

• It was a major concern.

• It was a minor issue.

• It was likely non-existent.

• It was confirmed by the briefing.

What was the speaker's emotional response to the lack of information?

• Angry and frustrated.

• Surprised and saddened.

• Happy and relieved.

• Indifferent and calm.