General Election 2015 - Ed Miliband Foreign Policy Speech At Chatham House

General Election 2015 - Ed Miliband Foreign Policy Speech At Chatham House

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the importance of maintaining a strong defense strategy and commitment to armed forces, despite economic challenges. It highlights the need for strategic planning before making long-term spending decisions to avoid past mistakes. The potential impact of proposed conservative spending cuts on defense is analyzed, raising concerns among allies and military personnel. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not sacrificing defense for ideological reasons and reaffirms a commitment to finding resources for defense in future planning.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the speaker's stance on maintaining a strong defense posture?

The speaker suggests reducing it.

The speaker is indifferent.

The speaker emphasizes its importance.

The speaker believes it is unnecessary.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does the speaker criticize the proposed conservative spending cuts?

They are seen as beneficial for defense.

They could be catastrophic for defense.

They are expected to have no impact.

They are supported by allies.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What concerns do the proposed spending cuts raise?

They are ignored by defense experts.

They are seen as a minor issue.

They are welcomed by military personnel.

They alarm allies and military personnel.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest about future defense spending decisions?

They should ignore strategic reviews.

They should prioritize cuts.

They should avoid past mistakes.

They should be made hastily.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the speaker propose to handle the deficit while maintaining defense?

By making extreme cuts.

By sacrificing defense.

By avoiding ideological commitments.

By ignoring the deficit.