CLEAN : Italian surgeon Macchiarini 'in essential part satisfied' with verdict: laywer

The video discusses a court case involving a client named Powell, who was acquitted in significant parts of the charges against him. The client and his representative are satisfied with the judgment, especially regarding the first two patients, where negligence was not found. However, there is concern about the court's decision on a third patient, where the risks were deemed disproportionate. The video also explores the potential for an appeal and the implications of media attention on the client. The decision to appeal is complex, considering the prosecutors' rights and the possible outcomes in higher courts.

What was Powell's reaction to the court's verdict regarding the first two patients?

• He was indifferent to the verdict.

• He was dissatisfied with the outcome.

• He was satisfied with the judgment.

• He decided to appeal the decision.

What did the court conclude about Powell's actions concerning the last patient?

• He should have understood the risks were not proportional.

• He was praised for his decision-making.

• He acted with complete caution.

• He was found negligent in all cases.

What is a key consideration before deciding to appeal the court's decision?

• The potential media coverage.

• The public opinion on the case.

• The cost of the appeal process.

• The possible actions of the prosecutors.

Who has the right to appeal the court's judgment in Sweden?

• The prosecutors.

• The media.

• Only the victim.

• Only the defendant.

What is the main concern regarding the media's role in Powell's case?

• The media has ignored the case.

• The media has been indifferent.

• The media has been supportive.

• The media has been extremely hysterical.