GM to Test New Self-Driving Fleet in New York City

GM to Test New Self-Driving Fleet in New York City

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses GM's testing of self-driving cars in complex environments like New York City, aiming to enhance learning and safety. It explores the potential profitability of a self-driving ride-hailing business and GM's strategy to control and operate the fleet. The integration of software, engineering, and manufacturing under one roof is highlighted as a key advantage. The transcript also touches on GM's strategic investment in Lyft and the future of shared mobility, emphasizing the intersection of autonomous and electric vehicles.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is New York City considered a significant location for testing self-driving cars?

It has a simple road network.

It is a less populated city.

It has fewer traffic regulations.

It offers a highly complex environment.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary goal before launching self-driving cars into commercial service?

Reducing the cost of production

Achieving an appropriate safety level

Increasing the number of test vehicles

Expanding to more cities

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is GM's approach to the self-driving taxi market?

Selling the technology to other companies

Operating a self-driving taxi service

Focusing solely on manufacturing

Partnering with competitors

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does GM view the relationship between autonomous vehicles and electrification?

They are unrelated technologies.

All autonomous vehicles will be electric.

Electrification is not a priority.

Autonomous vehicles will rely on fossil fuels.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What advantage does GM have by keeping all capabilities under one roof?

It allows for faster technology deployment.

It limits the scope of innovation.

It reduces the need for partnerships.

It increases the cost of operations.