Fed Didn't Anticipate Depth of Supply Shock: Clarida

Fed Didn't Anticipate Depth of Supply Shock: Clarida

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the impact of supply shocks on monetary policy, highlighting the unexpected global supply shock and its challenges. It explains the Federal Reserve's dual mandate focusing on the labor market and price stability. The video also analyzes the labor market's recovery and wage trends following a severe recession, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a healthy labor market for broad-based gains.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key feature of the new monetary policy framework discussed in the video?

Immediate liftoff regardless of employment levels

Delaying liftoff until certain economic conditions are met

Focusing solely on inflation control

Ignoring global supply shocks

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the Federal Reserve's dual mandate differ from other central banks?

It prioritizes inflation over employment

It disregards price stability

It focuses on economic slack rather than the labor market

It emphasizes the labor market over broader economic slack

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of achieving a fully employed labor market according to the video?

It reduces the need for monetary policy adjustments

It causes economic instability

It results in broader and deeper gains for different societal groups

It leads to higher inflation rates

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a notable feature of the labor market during the severe recession mentioned in the video?

An increase in unemployment benefits

A complete halt in economic activity

A stable wage inflation despite high unemployment

A significant decrease in wage inflation

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the labor market's performance in the recent recession compare to previous years?

It was similar to 2017 levels

It was better than in 2017

It was worse than in 2011

It showed no signs of recovery