CLEAN : Nigeria attacks Twitter over president's deleted 'civil war' remark

The transcript discusses the concept of universal rules and freedom of expression, highlighting the role of Twitter in Nigeria and its potential agenda. It examines the impact of social media on protests, particularly during the EndSARS movement in Nigeria, and the subsequent violence. The discussion extends to insurrection and how organizations can influence such events, emphasizing the right to express dismay and anger.

What is emphasized about the freedom of expression in the first section?

• It is not applicable to high-ranking officials.

• It is only applicable in specific countries.

• It is a universal rule applicable to everyone.

• It is limited to certain individuals.

What is questioned about Twitter's actions in Nigeria?

• The financial status of Twitter in Nigeria.

• The motives behind deleting certain tweets.

• The legality of Twitter's presence in Nigeria.

• The popularity of Twitter among Nigerian youth.

During the EndSARS protests, what was Twitter's stance?

• Supporting the government.

• Remaining neutral.

• Promoting violence.

• Upholding the right to protest.

What does the final section suggest about organizations that direct members to commit violent acts?

• They are engaging in insurrection.

• They are exercising their rights.

• They are promoting peace.

• They are following legal procedures.

What right does the final section affirm for leaders?

• The right to express dismay and anger.

• The right to enforce laws.

• The right to ignore public opinion.

• The right to remain silent.