Blackstone Deal Marks Biggest Buyout Since Financial Crisis

Blackstone Deal Marks Biggest Buyout Since Financial Crisis

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a significant $20 billion LBO deal involving Thomson Reuters and Blackstone, drawing parallels to the Golden Age of private equity in 2006-2007. It highlights the current trends in LBOs, where large capital pools are amassed but not always followed by large deals. The discussion speculates on the future of LBOs, considering the active M&A market and recent tax reforms, which have sparked interest and excitement in the financial community.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of the $20 billion LBO deal involving Thomson Reuters?

It marks the end of large-scale LBOs.

It is a small deal compared to past LBOs.

It signifies a return to large-scale LBOs reminiscent of 2006-2007.

It is unrelated to private equity trends.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What has been the trend in private equity regarding capital and deal sizes?

Both capital and deal sizes have increased.

Both capital and deal sizes have decreased.

Capital has increased, but deal sizes have not followed.

Capital has decreased, and deal sizes have increased.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Blackstone's involvement in the deal reflect on future LBO trends?

It implies a shift away from private equity.

It suggests a decline in LBO activity.

It indicates a potential for more large deals.

It shows a focus on smaller deals.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the state of the M&A market in 2018 according to the transcript?

It is unaffected by recent tax reforms.

It is off to the best start since 2000.

It is experiencing a downturn.

It is stagnant compared to previous years.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role did tax reform play in the M&A market activity?

It had no impact on market activity.

It caused confusion among investors.

It contributed to increased market activity.

It led to a decrease in market activity.