Scottish Conservative politicians react to Holyrood committee inquiry

The transcript discusses a parliamentary inquiry into the First Minister's conduct, highlighting issues of misleading Parliament, the impact on two women whose complaints were not fully investigated, and financial costs to taxpayers. It raises concerns about evidence handling and privacy, compares this situation to other unresolved inquiries, and emphasizes conflicting narratives.

What was the main issue with the committee set up by the First Minister?

• It was not properly funded.

• It was accused of misleading Parliament.

• It had too many members.

• It was not recognized by the government.

What was a significant financial concern mentioned in the inquiry?

• The committee's budget was exceeded.

• The Scottish taxpayer had to pay over half a million pounds.

• The inquiry was funded by private donations.

• The committee members were unpaid.

How was the evidence from the women handled during the inquiry?

• It was made public immediately.

• It was kept private for committee deliberations.

• It was ignored by the committee.

• It was leaked to the press.

Which other inquiry was mentioned as not being conducted?

• The inquiry into the Finance Minister's conduct.

• The inquiry into the Health Minister's conduct.

• The inquiry into the Transport Minister's conduct.

• The inquiry into the Education Minister's conduct.

What was the final decision of the parliamentary inquiry regarding the First Minister?

• The First Minister was found to have misled Parliament.

• The First Minister was fined.

• The First Minister resigned.

• The First Minister was cleared of all accusations.