Women Only Dress Codes Still Rife in U.K.

The video discusses a woman's petition against mandatory high heels at work, which gained significant support. It highlights broader issues of gender, disability, and racial discrimination linked to dress codes. Current workplace equality laws are deemed ineffective, with women still judged by appearance. The report suggests legal reviews and stricter penalties for non-compliance. Personal opinions emphasize the need for choice in workplace attire. Despite progress, the MPs report indicates more work is needed for true gender equality.

What was the initial action taken by the woman who was dismissed for not wearing high heels?

• She filed a lawsuit against her employer.

• She organized a protest outside her workplace.

• She wrote a letter to the editor of a major newspaper.

• She started a petition that gained significant support.

Which types of discrimination are highlighted in the second section?

• Only gender discrimination

• Discrimination based on age and gender

• Discrimination based on educational background

• Discrimination against people with disabilities and racial discrimination

What did the parliamentary investigation find about current workplace equality laws?

• They are only partially effective for certain industries.

• They are ineffective and need to be reviewed.

• They are effective but need better enforcement.

• They are highly effective and need no changes.

What does the committee report recommend to tackle workplace discrimination?

• A complete overhaul of the dress code policies

• Increased financial penalties for employers who breach the law

• Mandatory training sessions for all employees

• A public awareness campaign about dress codes

What is the suggested condition for women to wear high heels at work?

• If it is part of a uniform requirement

• If it is a special occasion

• If all male colleagues also wear heels

• If the manager personally requests it