Antitrust Rule of Reason Per Se Illegality

Antitrust Rule of Reason Per Se Illegality

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explains antitrust law, focusing on the Sherman Act's per se illegality and the rule of reason. Per se illegality deems certain market activities illegal without further justification, while the rule of reason evaluates the competitive impact of conduct. The quick look or truncated rule of reason allows courts to consider pro competitive evidence for activities otherwise deemed per se illegal. The tutorial outlines factors considered in rule of reason analysis, such as market conditions and competitive effects.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does 'per se illegality' imply under antitrust law?

Activities are evaluated based on their market impact.

Activities are automatically illegal without further justification.

Activities are legal unless proven otherwise.

Activities are illegal only if they harm consumers.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which standard involves evaluating the overall circumstances to determine if conduct is anti-competitive?

Per Se Illegality

Quick Look Rule of Reason

Rule of Reason

Strict Liability Standard

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What factors are considered under the Rule of Reason?

Only the history of the restraint

The convenience to suppliers and consumers

The legality of the conduct

The financial status of the company

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the purpose of the quick look or truncated rule of reason?

To apply strict liability without investigation

To automatically deem conduct illegal

To allow evidence that might justify conduct otherwise illegal

To ignore any pro-competitive justifications

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Under what condition does the court proceed to a full rule of reason investigation?

If the conduct is per se illegal

If the initial evidence is convincing

If there is no evidence presented

If the conduct is beneficial to consumers