JPMorgan Doesn’t See an 'Endless Trade War' for U.S. and China

JPMorgan Doesn’t See an 'Endless Trade War' for U.S. and China

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the historical context of trade wars, focusing on the US-China trade relationship. It highlights China's significant role in the US trade deficit and the political implications. The discussion also covers intellectual property theft and the US-EU stance on this issue. Finally, it addresses technological advancements in China and the US, emphasizing the need for the US to keep pace with innovation.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the general view of economists on trade wars?

They are necessary for technological advancement.

They are detrimental and lead to a race to the bottom.

They are beneficial for economic growth.

They have no impact on the economy.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is China often perceived as the 'bad guy' in trade discussions?

Because of its large population.

Because it has a strong military presence.

Due to its cultural influence.

Due to its significant contribution to the U.S. trade deficit.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a shared concern between the U.S. and the EU regarding China?

China's military expansion.

China's cultural exports.

China's environmental policies.

China's intellectual property practices.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential justification for trade wars according to the discussion?

To increase cultural exchange.

To ensure changes in China's IP practices.

To reduce military tensions.

To promote tourism.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What concern is raised about China's technological advancements?

China may become self-sufficient and not rely on American technology.

China's technology is outdated.

China's technology is becoming too expensive.

China is not investing in technology.