CLEAN : Kiev failed to probe protest violence: Council of Europe

The transcript discusses the importance of public scrutiny and compliance with international standards in investigating cases of death or injury. It highlights the role of cooperation between investigating authorities and the Prosecutor General's Office in ensuring the effectiveness of the judicial system. The effectiveness of investigations into the Maidan events is examined, with a focus on the lack of cooperation impacting outcomes. The panel's findings on evidence and conclusions are also discussed, noting insufficient evidence to determine the involvement of sniper weapons or a third force.

Why is public scrutiny important in the investigation of individual cases of death or injury?

• To reduce the cost of investigations

• To speed up the judicial process

• To increase the number of investigations

• To ensure compliance with international standards

What was a major factor affecting the effectiveness of the Maidan investigations?

• Close cooperation between investigating authorities

• Public protests

• Media coverage

• Lack of funding

What was the impact of the lack of cooperation with the Prosecutor General's office?

• Improved investigation outcomes

• Increased public awareness

• Faster judicial processes

• Negative impact on investigation effectiveness

What did the panel find regarding the evidence of deaths or injuries caused by sniper weapons?

• The evidence was conclusive

• There was insufficient evidence

• The evidence was overwhelming

• There was clear evidence

What was the panel unable to express a view on?

• The reasonableness of the conclusions reached

• The public's reaction to the investigations

• The number of investigations conducted

• The media's role in the investigations