Interview with Ben Wallace at Mihail Kogalniceanu Airbase

The transcript discusses the rhetoric surrounding the liberation of Mariupol, highlighting the resistance from Ukrainians, including those near the Russian border, against Russian forces. It acknowledges the tragic losses suffered and attributes responsibility to the Russian military and political leaders. The discussion also covers the international support for Ukraine, including the provision of armored vehicles. Finally, it critiques the Kremlin's rhetoric, emphasizing its reliance on false narratives and propaganda.

What was a fundamental weakness in the Russian approach to liberating Mariupol?

• Arrogant belief in liberation

• Geographical challenges

• Lack of military resources

• Support from international allies

Why did Russian forces have to withdraw from north of Kiev?

• Weather conditions

• International pressure

• Strong Ukrainian resistance

• Lack of supplies

What responsibility does the Russian government hold according to the second section?

• Environmental damage

• Economic sanctions

• Diplomatic failures

• Tragic losses in the conflict

What type of support is being provided to Ukraine?

• Financial aid

• Food assistance

• Medical supplies

• Armored vehicles

What is a key criticism of the Kremlin's rhetoric?

• It is too transparent

• It is too aggressive

• It is based on lies

• It is too conciliatory