Obama Said to Nominate Merrick Garland to Supreme Court

Obama Said to Nominate Merrick Garland to Supreme Court

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses Merrick Garland's nomination to the Supreme Court, highlighting his legal credentials and bipartisan support. It explores the political challenges Republicans face in blocking his nomination, given his moderate stance and previous support from both parties. Megan Murphy provides analysis on the political implications, noting Obama's strategic choice to nominate Garland. The video concludes with a discussion on Garland's judicial reputation and the potential political fight surrounding his nomination.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who is Merrick Garland, and why is his nomination significant?

He is a former President of the United States.

He is a controversial figure with no bipartisan support.

He is a new political figure with no prior experience.

He is a well-respected judge with bipartisan support.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What notable case was Merrick Garland involved in?

The impeachment of Bill Clinton

The Watergate Scandal

The prosecution of Timothy McVeigh

The Enron Scandal

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key characteristic of Merrick Garland's judicial approach?

He is known for his extreme liberal views.

He is known for his extreme conservative views.

He is known for his moderate stance.

He is known for his lack of legal experience.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Merrick Garland's background compare to John Roberts?

Garland is more liberal than Roberts.

Garland is more conservative than Roberts.

Garland has no judicial experience compared to Roberts.

Garland has a similar moderate background to Roberts.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What political strategy is associated with Garland's nomination?

To appoint a justice with extreme views.

To appoint a justice with no prior experience.

To challenge Republicans with a moderate nominee.

To appoint the first Asian American justice.