CLEAN : French court delays decision on Calais Jungle eviction

The transcript discusses the anticipation of a fair decision from a judge regarding a humanitarian issue in France. It highlights the judge's visit to a large area known as the jungle, where she was provided with extensive documentation. The potential outcomes of the case include the destruction of part of the jungle or an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights. The speaker expresses hope that the judge will consider the welfare of children who would lose protection if forced to leave the jungle.

What is the speaker's expectation from the judge based on previous experiences?

• A positive humanitarian response due to past fair decisions

• A quick decision without much consideration

• A negative response due to past unfair decisions

• Indifference from the judge

What is one of the potential actions if the case is lost?

• Appealing to the United Nations

• Starting a protest

• Appealing to the European Court of Human Rights

• Accepting the decision without further action

What might happen to the southern half of the jungle if the case is lost?

• It will be turned into a park

• It will be destroyed

• It will be expanded

• It will be preserved

What is the speaker's hope regarding the judge's visit to the camp?

• That the judge will have a heart and consider the children's plight

• That the judge will focus only on legal aspects

• That the judge will ignore the situation

• That the judge will expedite the decision

Why is the speaker concerned about the children in the camp?

• They might have to change schools

• They would lose protection if forced to leave

• They might lose their toys

• They would have to move to a different camp