Henderson-Janus Merger and the Future of Active Investing

Henderson-Janus Merger and the Future of Active Investing

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the increasing pressure on active fund managers due to the rise of passive investments, leading to mergers like that of Henderson and Janus. The merger aims to provide scale and distribution advantages, with a focus on global expansion despite Brexit. The industry faces challenges, but the merger is seen as a strategic move to remain competitive. Market reactions are positive, though governance with Co-CEOs may pose future challenges.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main reasons for the merger between Henderson and Janus?

To increase their passive investment offerings

To provide more scale and distribute products more easily

To focus solely on the UK market

To reduce their workforce significantly

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the Brexit vote influence the merger talks between Henderson and Janus?

It accelerated the merger process

It had no impact as talks began before the vote

It led to a shift in focus to the US market

It caused the merger to be postponed

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a significant market trend mentioned by Luke Ellis regarding investment funds?

A rise in active management

A decline in passive funds

Pressure on both active and passive funds

An increase in event-driven funds

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the market react to the merger announcement between Henderson and Janus?

Cautiously, with a slight decrease in share prices

Negatively, with a drop in share prices

Positively, with an increase in share prices

Indifferently, with no change in share prices

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential challenge is associated with having Co-CEOs in the merged company?

Increased operational costs

Leadership challenges and decision-making conflicts

Difficulty in expanding to new markets

Lack of innovation in product offerings