CLEAN: UN war crimes court jails ex-Yugoslav army chief

The video discusses a general's disappointment with his high sentence, emphasizing that waging war is not a crime under international law. It highlights the intention to file a vigorous appeal and provides historical context involving Yugoslavia. The video concludes with a discussion on crimes and their consequences.

What was the general's reaction to being found culpable and receiving a high sentence?

• He was pleased with the outcome.

• He was indifferent to the sentence.

• He was disappointed by the sentence.

• He was unaware of the sentence.

According to international law, what is the stance on waging war?

• It is considered a crime.

• It is only a crime in certain countries.

• It is always justified.

• It is not considered a crime.

What action is planned in response to the high sentence?

• An appeal will be filed.

• The sentence will be accepted.

• A public protest will be organized.

• No action will be taken.

Which council was involved in the events of 1993 and 1995?

• The International Criminal Court

• The European Council

• The Supreme Defense Council

• The United Nations Security Council

What was Yugoslavia's role in the events discussed?

• They acted as peacekeepers.

• They were involved in arms deliveries.

• They were neutral in the conflict.

• They provided humanitarian aid.